2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. On June 22, 1913, the GJ 7,916, the GJ 5,959, the K 334, the L 1,337, the M 210, the N 33, the O 1,035, the P 1,035 (hereinafter “each assessment land”) was discovered on June 22, 1913.

B. Land co-ownership with respect to each circumstance was destroyed during the 6.25 period, and subsequent R was incorporated into Sicheon-gun S.

Accordingly, the location, lot number, land category, and land register of each assessment land are as shown in the attached real estate list.

[However, although the land cadastre area of the land in the attached list 1 is restored to 26,202 square meters, it is registered as the area of the cadastral restoration map beyond the permissible error in the area between the area of the land survey division and the area of the cadastral restoration.]

Since the plaintiffs T was occupied by the "Masung U" on July 6, 1913 (2 years in 1913), the difference between the Chinese name of the plaintiffs and the Chinese name of the above person is identical, and the address at the time of the above situation (22 June 1913) is also consistent.

(F) The plaintiffs' fleet T should be deemed to be the same person as Q and the same person, who received the assessment of each situation's land.

The Plaintiffs are successors to Q Q’s property, each assessment of the circumstances and land.

【Ground for Recognition: Evidence No. 1-3-3 of A or Evidence No. 4-3 of this Court, the results of fact inquiry to the head of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the head of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, each circumstance’s land shall be deemed to be owned by the plaintiffs, who are the property successors of Q, who are the names of the circumstances, and as long as the defendant contests this, the plaintiffs shall have the interest to seek confirmation.

3. Acknowledgement the plaintiffs' claims.