However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 27, 2017, the Defendant, at around 23:45, Kimhae-si B, and 5th floor C reading room, and the Defendant called up after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and was asked questions about personal information, etc. from the slope E belonging to the D District Unit of the Police Station, saying, “Cins, the police will have been past, but the police will have been past,” and assault the chest of the above E on a drinking basis by having the chest flick at one time and two hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Order to attend a lecture or order to attend a community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: A sentence of recommendation that the sentencing on the one-month period from August to June 1 of a year to June 4 of a year: No relevant person shall be imposed: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of one year: Imprisonment with prison labor for a period of six months/suspension of execution, two years of a stay of execution, 40 hours attending a lecture, and reasons for an increase of 40 hours by 40 hours: A confession, confession, reasons for mitigation of damage, etc.: medical treatment and relief for the happiness of a uniform police officer, need for protection, family members (two children, children, etc.), family members (two children, etc.), etc.;