When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

To the extent that the facts charged in the indictment do not disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, some amendments were made according to the facts obtained through the examination of evidence.

1. On October 25, 2010, the Defendant of the 2013 Highest 1876 case stated to the victim D that “B is the inheritance female of the real estate adjacent to the Sinan-ri fishing village in the Sin-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-do-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-do-ri-ri-do-ri-do-ri-do-ri

However, the Defendant did not inherit a large amount of real estate, and there was no intention or ability to repay, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim, as the expenses for finding her husband and the cost of living was insufficient.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, received KRW 2 million from the victim on the same day by deceiving the victim, and acquired the money by remitting the total of KRW 48 million on four occasions as shown in the attached Table 1 from November 1, 2010.

2. Cases 2013 Highest 1946;

A. A. On August 27, 2010, the Defendant: (a) around 12:20 on August 27, 2010, the Defendant stated that “A vehicle and driver’s license is needed between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff, who is a real estate consultant and a vehicle with bad duty in the company.” However, at the same time, the Defendant, who did not have a driver’s license at the time, thought that the Defendant would rapidly be a handman to find out the married husband, and there was no intention or ability to pay the above expenses even if he was provided with the above services from the victim. Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, had the victim drive the vehicle in the Padju and Suwon for about seven hours at the Padju for a period of time.