When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a business owner who operates Eelel in Ulsan-gu D.

On July 16, 2014, around 23:40 on July 23: 2014, the Defendant, despite being aware of the fact that H and I, an employee of entertainment drinking club F, wanted to engage in sexual traffic, provided a place for sexual traffic by means of replacing the above Eel 403.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against H, I, G, and J;

1. Each investigation report (for example, 7, 12, 13, 14, 28, 36, 54) (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant and his defense counsel did not know that the defendant had sexual traffic with H and I, but according to the evidence above, the defendant's receipt of the above sexual traffic customers by the J upon the request of the J which is the owner of the sexual traffic business place is sufficiently recognized) shall be applied to the law.

1. Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of a fine concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;