사기등
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months;
However, the above punishment shall be imposed for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
[criminal power] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on July 11, 2013 for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act at the Goyang Branch of the District Court on July 3, 2013 and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 11, 2013.
【Criminal Facts】
Defendant
A is a person in charge of the management of commercial buildings, the collection and disbursement of management expenses for commercial buildings, the management expenses, and other expenses while working as the head of the management office of Goyang-gu G commercial building in Yongsan-gu from October 2009 to September 2013 (hereinafter referred to as "the main commercial building"). Defendant B, from July 2012 to May 2013, operated the mainH in charge of security services for unsold commercial buildings among the main commercial buildings, and Defendant C, as the head of the five main business, was in charge of the affairs of real estate trust, such as the payment of management expenses for unsold commercial buildings and the selection of security service companies among the main commercial buildings. On the other hand, the J purchased the main commercial building through public sale from the Korea Land Trust on or around December 206, 206 through the so-called "PF loan loan" operated by the Korea Land Trust Association, and the trust company and the trust company in charge of the preservation and maintenance of various expenses for the real estate unsold in lots.
1. Evidence of breach of trust by Defendant A and B;
A. Defendant A’s sole criminal conduct around December 201, 201, the Defendant made an illegal solicitation that Defendant A would be selected as a security service company for unsold prices in this commercial building, which is an enterprise run by K, the Defendant’s high-ranking shop, as a security service company for the unsold prices in the commercial building, and C accepted the said solicitation and appointed the said L as a security service company for the commercial building.
Since then, on April 26, 2012, the Defendant: (a) returned one million won to the new bank account in the name of C under the name of “a request the company to carry out security services continuously” in relation to the case where the Defendant selected the said L as a security service company for the said commercial building; and (b) to allow the said company to carry out security services.