In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

1. At around 22:45 on November 5, 2014, Defendant A, while carrying a mobile phone call on the road located prior to the Busan Pyeong-gu, Busan, the Busan, the Busan, Police Station C District at the Busan, and the victim slope E, who patrols the location, are dangerous to the Defendant, and thus, they are under surveillance on the ground that they instructed and interfered with the Defendant’s road on the road, and thus, the victims are exposed to “the victims who are receiving a mobile phone, and the width is the same as bitson, and the bit of bit of bitch, and the bits are the same bit of bitch, and the bits are known to the citizens.”

2. While Defendant B, who is a single criminal act at the time, time, and place described in paragraph (1), does not observe the victim’s desire to take a bath to the victim E, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim “it is too difficult for the general citizen to take a bath to the police officer because it is not too likely that the general citizen might take a bath to the police officer,” Defendant B expressed the victim’s desire to “the victim is publicly insulting with the thickness of the main phase.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the petition of complaints filed in D and E;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Defendant A of ordinary concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;