beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.07.13 2016고단2258

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a neighbor who lives in an apartment, such as the victim C (V, 81).

On June 23, 2016, the Defendant mentioned 18:00, the Defendant: (a) on June 23, 2016, the Defendant: (b) on the 15th elevator of the 15th elevator, the day before the first day by which the injured party of the drinking-do Da apartment house 2; and (c) on the basis of the Defendant’s “Isker d

얘기 좀 하자. ”라고 하자 이를 무시한 채 집 안으로 들어가려 하고, 이에 피해 자가 피고인의 가방 끈을 잡고 피고인의 집 안으로 따라 들어가며 다시 “ 얘기 좀 하자. ”라고 하자 “ 나가라. ”라고 말하며 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 수회 때리고, 피해자를 밀쳐 피해자가 바닥에 쓰러지게 하고, 피해자가 다시 일어서며 피고인의 가방 끈을 잡으려 하자 발로 피해자의 가슴 부위를 힘껏 차고, 바닥에 머리를 찧은 채 넘어져 있는 피해자의 허리를 발로 밟았다.

The defendant continued to have a person who was not deprived of the defendant's kn't get off the defendant, or entered the victim's arms with his arms, and led the victim into the house, and then when the victim's kn's kn't can't get the victim into the room.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as soft weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, C, and F;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of each written diagnosis (Evidence No. 50,51 page) statute;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation was the victim, and the compensation for damage was not yet made, and the defendant suffered from the dynamic dynamic disorder, such as denying the crime, and the fact that the defendant does not reflect the fact that the defendant suffered from the dynamic dynamic disorder. Although it is intended to follow the defendant's abnormal dynamic behavior, the victim caused the crime of this case.