도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Punishment of the crime
1. Around 22:50 on October 18, 2018, the Defendant driving a Poter II truck without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of about 10 km from the front of the original village hall located on the two-lane 5-lane 5, Yangyang-dong, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do to the national highway No. 19, which is located on approximately 56-38, 10km from the front of the original village hall located on the two-lane 5, Yangyang-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do.
2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of cargo vehicles specified in paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act.
On October 18, 2018, the Defendant driving the above vehicle at a speed that would not be known to the 19-lane 56-38 of letter Do 19, which is 56-38, from the boundary of the tring intersection, the two-lane 56-38.
At the time, there are nights and the state of milched boom. Therefore, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the motor vehicle by driving the motor vehicle, such as accurately operating the front left left and right well, and the steering direction and the brake system.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and failed to properly operate the steering direction and brakes, and the bill of indictment administered by the defendant's driving vehicle management office in front of the left side of the defendant's driving vehicle does not contain matters related to the victim. However, the defendant's own authority without changing the indictment to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's exercise of defense, based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court.
The central separation zone of roads was received.
Ultimately, the indictment that damages the above central separation zone due to occupational negligence as mentioned above is that the central separation zone should be damaged to the extent that the amount of the central separation zone is not the repair cost, but according to the investigation report (Evidence No. 7), the central separation zone is the statement of the victim's staff.