beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.09.26 2017고단3715

재물손괴등

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2017, the defendant around 22:00, at the dormitory room in Youngcheon-si, C apartment 10, 602, the defendant reported that he/she is a tree with his/her husband F while having a dispute with his/her husband F, and that he/she is a tree with his/her husband, but he/she has heard the word that he/she does not interfere with E, but he/she has entered the door as his/her own plan, and therefore, he/she has lost its utility by making it possible when he/she can visit the dormitory managed by the victim G to lock the door at a time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the occurrence of a crime;

1. Investigation report (the other party investigation of the dormitory manager);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. A fine of 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (the Defendant is the primary offender, and his mistake is divided and seriously reflected.

In the process of dispute with E residing together with the same dormitory, this case was committed contingently. The degree of damage caused by the damage of this case is minor.

The injured party has agreed smoothly with the accused and the wife of the accused.

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. The summary of the facts charged and the victim E (the age of 54) are the space between the Defendant and the victim E (the age of 54) with other rooms written and residing in the dormitory of Yong-si, Youngcheon-si, 10-dong 602.

around 22:00 on May 31, 2017, the Defendant: (a) considered the victim’s husband’s her husband’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son, and “

Although the victim had been “Is that I would not interfere with the Party’s credit,” I expressed that I would like to read “Is, Is that Is that I would go too to Is, Is that Is, Is that Is, Is, Is that Is you would go too,” and assault the victim by forceing the victim’s hand on both hand.

2. Determination is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which is the same Article.