폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. In the absence of intrusion upon the victim E’s residence at around 18:00 on September 2013, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged (No. 2015 high group 5996) by misunderstanding the fact.
B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. On September 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a gate that was not corrected at the victim E (V)’s residence located in the Busan East-gu, Busan-do around 18:00 on the date of the end of the charge; and (b) opened a new door and entered the entrance of the kitchen and intrudes on another’s residence at the entrance of the kitchen.
2) 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들, 특히 원심 증인 E의 법정 진술에 의하면 피고인이 2013. 9월 일자 불상 18:00 경 혼자 거주하던 피해자의 집 현관문을 열고 들어가 거실을 통과하여 주방에 들어간 사실, 당시 피고인은 신발을 신은 채로 갑자기 피해자의 주방에 들어간 사실, 이에 피해자가 놀라서 ‘ 뭐 하는데요 ’라고 항의하자 피고인은 주방을 둘러보더니 아무 말도 하지 않은 채 쓱 나가 버린 사실을 인정할 수 있고, 위 인정사실에 의하면 피고인이 피해자 주거를 침입하였다는 이 부분 공소사실을 넉넉히 인정할 수 있어 원심이 위 범죄사실을 유죄로 인정한 것은 정당하고, 원심판결에 피고인의 주장과 같은 사실 오인의 위법이 없다.
B. As to the wrongful assertion of sentencing, the crime of this case is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as: (a) the defendant continues to assault or injure the victims residing in adjoining areas; (b) the nature of the crime is inferior in light of the background and content of the crime; and (c) the defendant did not agree with the victims; and (d) he did not make any effort to recover damage until now.