2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the facts of the crime, and is against the defendant's actual interest in the crime of this case. The defendant is the first offender, etc., while the crime of this case is committed in return for compensation and lending the means of access. In light of various social harm caused by the distribution of the so-called passbook, it is necessary to strictly punish the means of access in consideration of the fact that the means of access transferred by the defendant was actually used for the crime of Bosing, and other various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, character and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the punishment of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's argument is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.