2. The judgment shows the defendant's attitude to recognize and reflect the defendant's criminal conduct, and the victims are also responsible for the occurrence of the damage. However, these points appears to have been considered in the court below even though they were already committed a crime even before the same suspension of execution, in light of the fact that the defendant committed a crime even before the same suspension of execution, specific method of committing a crime using the weak points of the victims, the damage amount is not completely recovered as much as 310 million won, and the damage amount is not recovered as much as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, family relationship, motive, method of crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc. In addition, considering all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.