When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 26, 2020, at around 22:30 on September 26, 2020, the Defendant damaged the Defendant’s pantyty in an amount of approximately KRW 40,000,000 of the market price owned by the victim, as the Defendant met with the Defendant, at 6 times in the c main points located in Gumi-si B, Gumi-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation and report internal investigation (limited to additional cases which damage suspected property);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged (Assault) is as follows: (a) the Defendant neglected the Defendant’s duty of care to the victim D (the age of 43) who worked as an entertainment receptionist at the 6th room of the Cju located in Gumi-si B around September 26, 2020; (b) the victim D (the age of 43) who worked as an entertainment receptionist at the 6th room of the Cju located in Gumi-si, Gumi-si;

The Mazone Ba's theory is called Mazone, the victim's face and head are about 10 times in his/her hand, and the victim's knee is divided into knene and assaulted the victim.

2. This part of the facts charged is an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

In such a case, since the victim expressed his intention not to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.