2. Although the circumstances are recognized, such as the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime and reflects his mistake, it seems that the lower court’s sentencing had already been considered.

In addition, the crime of this case was committed by assaulting the victim D who had a relation with the victim of this case in a cruel and cruel manner for about six (6) weeks, causing bodily harm, such as blood transfusion and cerebral sye, etc., and assaulting the victim E who taken the face of the crime, in light of the method and content of the crime, etc., the nature of the crime is very poor in light of the method and contents of the crime, the victim D seems to have suffered a very great mental and physical pain, and the defendant was not able to be able to use the victim until now, and the defendant was unable to have been punished for the same or similar crime, and taking full account of various factors as shown in the argument of this case, such as equity in sentencing and sentencing as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is unfair because

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.