On June 12, 2013, the Defendant drafted a false accusation against E at the “D” office in Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Central District Office.

A written complaint was the content that "E was found to be the above office around 13:30 on October 9, 2012, and was assaulted by franchising dubs of the complainant and drinking his chest (hereinafter "the third assault of this case"), and around 13:00 on October 18, 2012, on the street side of the public parking lot located in the Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Jung-gu, for the purpose of killing the franchis of the complainant and drinking his chest (hereinafter "the fourth assault of this case")."

However, there was no fact that E made an assault or assault on the defendant at the office by leaving the office outside of the office, although there was a desire for the defendant when E made an objection to the issue of the outstanding amount due to finding the office of the defendant at the above time.

Nevertheless, on June 12, 2013, the defendant submitted the above complaint to the public prosecutor's office of Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office, whose name is not known at the public prosecutor's office of Seoul Central Public Prosecutor's Office, as the distribution of Seocho-gu Seoul Central Public Prosecutor

On August 2, 2013, at around 16:15, the Defendant made a statement that “E received a supplementary statement from the criminal defendant and the office of the Seoul Central Police Station and the office located in Jung-gu Seoul Central Police Station, Jung-gu, Seoul (hereinafter “instant First Violence”) around 16:30, on October 6, 2012, the Defendant used the cather bat around 15:00 on October 15, 2012, and used the cather bat around 15:0 of the c building to commit the cather bat (hereinafter “instant second assault”). However, there was no fact that E used the cather bat around October 6, 2012.”

In this respect, the defendant was arrested for the purpose of having E receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, G, and H;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each protocol of examination of the witness against H, A, I, J, F, G, and K.