2. In light of the legislative intent of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products for the purpose of guaranteeing the right of consumers to know the country of origin of agricultural and fishery products, even though the crime of this case is deemed to be in contravention of his mistake and there is no previous error, the crime of this case is not good quality in that it impedes the sound distribution order of the market and infringes the right food choice and trust of consumers, and the period and scale of selling the sled fish with the indication of origin in a false manner, and other various sentencing conditions provided for in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the court below is deemed to be appropriate and it cannot be deemed to be unfair.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.