Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On July 28, 2016, the Defendant entered the dry field of the victim D located in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si, and argued that the Defendant was snickly snicking because he did not destroy the existing snick in the dry field, but the Defendant did not take any measure against the victim. However, the Defendant did not extract the Defendant’s 40,000 won of the market value of the 90,000 snick-type snicking snicking snick.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (on-site photographing, etc.), investigation report (Attachment of a damaged stuffed photo submitted by shot E), investigation report (related to the statement of human father E together with the witness E at the time of damage to property);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The gist of the assertion is that the victim left studio in spite of the defendant's request, and the victim went to the dry field of the victim for the purpose of affixing his/her photograph, and there is no fact that he/she has taken straw fry.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, namely, ① Har E was sent to the victim’s dry field in the investigative agency and court, and at the victim’s dry field on the day of the instant case. However, the Defendant’s entry into a dry field and “no matter anything.”

b. Doz. Doz.

“After sound, I am at the victim’s house, and extract the head of a house that had been planted in dry field back to dry field, and part of the head of a house that had been laid in a grass forest adjacent to dry field was discarded, and part of the house was put in the Defendant’s hand.

At the time, E has consistently made a specific statement in the situation, 2) E has taken a dry field photograph of the victim who remains part of the stuffed stuffed stuff for the remaining evidence immediately after the Defendant committed the crime, and 3) E has received daily allowances from the injured party.