However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Defendant

A is a rice processor who operates a Do administration plant under the trade name of "B agricultural partnership corporation" in Yong-Namnam Cancer E, and engages in the processing of Do administration plant using Do administration rice as a raw material.

1. 피고인 A 피고인은, 양곡가공업자는 양곡의 생산연도 등에 관하여 사실과 다른 표시ㆍ광고를 하여서는 아니됨에도 불구하고, 2013. 2. 8.경 2009년산 공매곡(조곡) 40kg 2,500포대를 농협을 통하여 40kg 1포대 당 30,500원에 낙찰 받고, 영암군 F에 있는 G정미소에서 2009년산 조곡 1,770포대를 매입하여 합계 170.8톤을 보관하던 중 104.8톤을 도정하여 쌀 71.2톤을 생산한 후 그 중 쌀 2.4톤은 2012년산 쌀과 혼합하여 2012년산 햅쌀로 판매하기로 마음먹었다.

On April 6, 2013, the Defendant discarded rice of 209 2.4 tons of the 2009 mountain bed and packagesed into the products name of “H”, “I”, etc. in the spot packing materials, and stored 10% of the rice of 2009 and 90% of the rice of 2012. However, the Defendant expressed the production year as “20kgggggg for 200,000 per 20kg for 40,000 won per 20kg for 16,000 g for each business partner.

The Defendant from around April 6, 2013, as well as this.

4. Until October, 100, a total of 47,600 gs (24,000 g) had been sold in total of 1,200 gs (24,000 g) of rice mixed with new and old rice two times, such as the attached list of crimes in the foregoing manner.

2. Defendant B, as the representative director, is a corporation that runs the business of selling products, such as “I,” after obtaining a bid from the agricultural cooperative and processing rice as a rice from the agricultural cooperative.

The above A, who is the representative director of the defendant, made a false indication on the production year as above in relation to the defendant's business at the above date and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Evidential photographs (B rice sold by the farming association corporation);

1. Results of the appraisal of the new guidance;