However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant damaged property by breaking up a digital philosophical phone at the front of the house of the victim D of the above apartment building on March 17, 2016, when he/she was dissatisfied with the upper floor and the lower floor residents and the side of the apartment management office on the ground of noise between the upper floor and the lower floor of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul apartment building. From March 17, 2016 to December 28 of the same year, one of the digital philophones at the same time as the opening and closing equipment of the victim’s entrance owned by the victim was destroyed by unfolding the repair cost of KRW 121,00,000 for the combined use of the opening and closing equipment of the entrance owned by the victim and destroying the property of KRW 3,11,000 in total over eight times during the period from that time to December 28 of the same year.

2. When the Defendant’s frequent act of destroying property that causes damage to the Defendant’s property, the Defendant: (a) closed the emergency stairs door on the apartment on December 28, 2016; and (b) destroyed the door door leading to KRW 30,000,00 of the repair cost by using a multi-functional knife, which is a dangerous object that was prepared in advance at around 14:0 on December 28, 2016, in a state where the Defendant possessed a multi-functional hick, and was in possession of a multi-functional hick; and (c) the door leading to the household of the said apartment occupant’s representative association on the nine-story floor; (d) the door door leading to a multi-functional hiffing; and (e) the door hiffed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, G, and H;

1. Each statement of D and I;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as deposit lists;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 369(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for observation of protection;

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment with prison labor for one month to seven years;

2. Crimes No. 1 of the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the scope of the recommended punishment] is the general standard (damage of property, etc.) of the increased area ( August-1 to June).