beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.10.31 2018고단3027

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on February 15, 2018, 00:40, 00:40, on the front side of the B Apartment apartment in the Sungsung-si, the Defendant, on February 15, 2018, assaulted the victim’s left-hand bucks, such as buckbucking down on the front side of the B apartment in the Sungsung-dong Police Station C District of the Sungsung-dong Police Station, which called the female upon receipt of a report of 112 that the female might be unsured, without any justifiable reason, under the influence of alcohol to the police D belonging to the C District of the Sung-dong Police Station, the Defendant called the victim’s left-hand bucks.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties of police officers in the 112 reported case.

The Defendant of the 2018 Highest 3163 on July 25, 2018, the Defendant: 05:30 on July 25, 2018, to the victim G (V, 21 years of age) who smokes tobacco in E in light of light name, in front of F cafeterias, and in front of the victim G (V, 21 years of age) who smokes tobacco.

In addition, it was assaulted by the victim H(the age of 20) in order to see that she is "a woman who attends a danran bar", and she was boomed by the victim H(the age of 20) in order to boom the head of the victim H(the age of 20).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of G and H

1. Article 136 (Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties) and Article 260 (1) (Assaults) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense under relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Imprisonment with labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (such as: (a) the Defendant did not have any criminal record; (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime in a contingent way, which is psychologically difficult due to a scaming; (c) the degree of damage; and (d) the victims, etc.).