At around 23:40 on May 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed, without any reason, that, within the D cafeteria located in Franpo City C, the Defendant took a bath to the fluent victim, who was living together, “Faatra, at the house of C,” without any reason; (b) assaulted the victim’s timber once, once, once, twice, and twice by drinking; (c) faat; (d) faat the victim’s faat; and (d) faat the victim’s faat; and (e) faat the victim’s faat, twice, by drinking it.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, it is recognized that the victim expressed his/her intent not to punish the Defendant on July 30, 2015, which was after the institution of the instant prosecution. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.