However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 22, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was found to have been driven by drinking by another person’s report by Party E, who was located at “D’s main points (out of space) for the operation of the Victim C, located in Silung City B on August 22, 2018; and (b) was cut off to the main points, and the Defendant was dead of the width.

“Along with the large interest of 30 minutes, it interfered with the normal operation of the victim’s main office by force, such as putting the three sick soldiers on the floor and breaking the three sick soldiers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A victim statement prepared in C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to data on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, including the circumstances indicated in the record, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the observation of protection and the circumstances indicated in the community service order.

The favorable circumstances: The history of punishment for crimes of violence committed several times, the ability to breath a failure under the influence of alcohol, and the control of a police officer's failure to comply with the police officer's control, and the degree of interference is not less light.