When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, at around 01:02 on August 9, 2016, settled the drinking value to the employee E at the “D” drinking house located in Silung-si, Silung-si, 2016, and canceled the payment of the card unless otherwise,.

“The victim is asked to the drinking house operator instead of drinking,” and the victim tried to see the answer to the effect that he is asked to the drinking house operator without drinking the alcohol, and to take the answer into consideration the will, and to see that he commits noise to the customers, thereby obstructing the victim’s drinking business by force for about 16 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of the investigation report (F phone investigation of a shote), investigation report (Attachment of a photograph of a suspect), investigation report (Attachment of a photograph of a criminal suspect), and application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the CCTV-cape photograph and CCTV image attached to the crime scene of a suspect

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;