2. The crime of this case is deemed to require strict punishment for the Defendants in light of the following: (a) the Defendants conspired to commit the crime of this case by deceiving the victims that the amount of money under the pretext of the entry fee paid to the victims who are the students of their age was paid out of the victims for the purpose of raising an accommodation; (b) the quality of the crime was poor; and (c) the amount obtained by the Defendants is relatively large; (d) the Defendants are resisting the crime of this case; (c) the Defendants are using the aforementioned money to purchase accommodation deposits or vehicles for the victims including the victims, which are actually used by the victims after receiving the above money from the victims; and (d) the Defendants are not obtained by personal arrival of the above money; (e) the Defendants sought a preference against the Defendants; and (e) Defendant B is a first offender with no criminal power, and Defendant A is subject to punishment exceeding the same kind of crime or punishment; and (e) the Defendants do not have any criminal history, and (e) the Defendants were deprived of their sexually and more severe punishment from domestic and foreign circumstances.