사기등
The criminal facts of the 2017 High Order 2221 of the judgment of the defendant are punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and the remainder.
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Highest 437"
1. On September 2015, the Defendant against the victim I is the victim I who made an investment in the Republic of Korea Association of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as Seoul, Incheon, and Jeju in an area where the investment is made, and if the investment is damaged, the victim I may be put up for money when he/she graduated from the Republic of Korea when he/she sets up the investment, and may receive a distribution of profits according to the ratio of the investment amount.
"A local government is making an investment in the commercial council," and the upper council may recover the full amount of money at maturity when it receives the deferred payment from a subscriber who terminates because there are many instances where the subscriber terminates with money.
“Along with a large amount of money to be invested in J, a currency exchange company, raising high-income of at least KRW 100 million per month. In doing so, “The principal is recovered in only one year and can be paid 8% per month.”
However, in fact, the Defendant did not actually make an investment in each of the above investment offices, and the subjects who met when they were confined in the detention center were falsely explained to the victim as they were. At the time, there was approximately KRW 170 million of personal debt, such as bonds, and the victim did not have any intent or ability to deliver the principal of the investment and the profits even if he received the money from the victim, such as the victim’s payment of a certain number of days.
On October 8, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 10,000,000,00 from the damaged person as principal of investment, from the time when he/she receives the money from the Saemaul Treasury account (K) under the name of the Defendant, to January 27, 2016, totaling KRW 130,810,000, as shown in the attached Table 1, from January 27, 2016.
Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
2. On June 15, 2016, the accused against the victim L is guilty of the lower judgment.