약정금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 73,425,00 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from October 5, 2013 to June 27, 2014.
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant is the Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association that obtained authorization from the head of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on October 24, 2006 to implement a housing redevelopment improvement project with respect to the housing size of 33,282 square meters outside Dongdaemun-gu Seoul and 98 square meters.
B. A dispute relating to the defendant's representative status (1) D was elected as the president of the defendant's association on December 3, 2009.
(2) E and F, the owner of land, etc. in the Defendant’s project zone, was the Seoul Administrative Court No. 2009Guhap4478, Oct. 24, 2006, filed a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity on the disposition of authorization to establish a partnership and rendered a judgment on Jun. 25, 2010, which was rendered by the above court. On February 17, 2011, the appellate court (Seoul High Court 2010Nu2301), rendered a dismissal judgment, and continued the case in the Supreme Court (201Du7656). At the time of the withdrawal of the lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity, F, as the representative of the Defendant’s executive at the time of the withdrawal of the above action, required the resignation and F, as the representative of the partnership. At the time of D, executives of the partnership, including D, issued a resignation and the Defendant’s resignation to F, G, and HF’s notice to the president on March 14, 2011.
(3) However, in order to ratification the appointment of an auditor G and H acting director on March 14, 201, the Defendant’s council of representatives held on March 24, 201 rejected all of the following: (a) the confirmation of appointment of an acting director for the president of a partnership and the resolution of suspension of performance of duties by all the association executives; and (b) the case of approval of an acting director for the president of a partnership was rejected even at the special meeting of July 24, 201 at the special meeting of the auditor G and H.
[On the other hand, the defendant's special meeting of August 11, 201 to suspend the performance of the duties of all the partnership officers as an agenda item No. 5-1, and each resolution was passed to approve F as an acting director of the partnership as an acting director of the partnership. However, the Seoul High Court case No. 2012Na43029 (the defendant is the defendant).