However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, who signed the company, is the military flag B and the five-story C health team in the military, and the victim D is the student of the aforementioned C’s personal tra bargaining.

On July 11, 2016, the Defendant, even though the victimized person did not take lessons from the Defendant, forged the victim’s private signature more than 12 times in total, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, from around that time to September 27, 2016, including entering the victim’s name in the course of study for the purpose of receiving tuition fees, signing the victim’s name on the side of the name and forging the victim’s private signature.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

2. The Defendant, as indicated in paragraph (1) above, submitted the curriculum table in which the victim’s signature was forged and forged, to a total of three times, including the horse around July 2016, the horse around August 2016, the horse around September 2016, and the horse around September 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised his signature of a forged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the curriculum table;

1. Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 239 of the Criminal Act on the crime) and Article 239 (2) and Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act on the crime (the point of exercising the above investigation signature);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act - Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Suspension of Execution - Circumstances favorable to him/her: The fact that the defendant acknowledges his/her mistake - The fact that he/she repeatedly forges