2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant repents his mistake.

However, in light of the fact that the crime of this case is not good, that the defendant committed the crime of this case again even though he had been tried for the same kind of crime, that the defendant committed the crime of this case again again despite the fact that the amount of damage was not a large amount, and the victims did not reach an agreement to recover or reach an agreement, the balance of sentencing with the same crime, the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable, and therefore the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.