If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

A. Although the owner of a building in violation of the Building Act intends to change a permitted or reported matter, he/she must obtain permission from the competent permitting authority or report it to the Mayor, etc., the Defendant, even though he/she had to do so on June 15, 2013, changed the use of a building to a house without permission to change the pre-retailed building from B and two lots natural environment conservation areas, and constructed a 3 square-type warehouse building.

Accordingly, the defendant changed the use of the building and additionally constructed the building without permission from the competent authorities.

B. A person who intends to divert farmland outside an agricultural promotion area for violating the Farmland Act shall obtain permission from the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, as prescribed by Presidential Decree, but the defendant is above a person.

At the same time and place as the paragraph, the retail store was changed to a house without obtaining permission for the diversion of farmland.

Accordingly, the defendant changed the purpose project for farmland diversion without permission from the competent authorities.

(c) Where intending to modify matters permitted for development activities in violation of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, the permission from the Mayor, etc. shall be obtained, and the defendant shall not violate restrictions on the use, type, size, etc. of buildings and other facilities within the specific use area.

In the same time and place as the same as the paragraph, the retail store was changed to the retail house without obtaining permission for development activities, and the detached house was constructed in violation of the restrictions on activities in the specific use area even though the location of the detached house

Accordingly, the defendant modified the purpose of permission for development activities without permission from the competent authorities, and violated restrictions on activities in specific use areas.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. An accusation and a building allocation scheme;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant statutory provisions and the former Building Act (amended by Act No. 12701, May 28, 2014) regarding criminal facts.