When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

No person shall place a false or misleading indication of origin, place a false or misleading indication of origin, or sell it in disguisedly.

From June 2014 to August 201 of the same year, the Defendant received rice with the phrase “F”, which may be confusedd with rice cultivated in Kimpo, from G, and sold to consumers the rice amounting to KRW 85,370,000 in total in the market price, with the word “F,” which may be confused with rice cultivated in Kimpo, while being aware that the rice cultivated in Kimpo, Kimpo, was not cultivated in the “E” of the Defendant’s operation in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning examination of the suspect of the G;

1. Notice of the result of origin verification and investigation report (A relative investigation);

1. Copy, etc. of each statement of transactions;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing rice photographs of F;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 14 and 6 (1) 1 (including comprehensive) of the Act on the Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products, imprisonment with labor and fines concurrently;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., that the defendant reflects his/her mistake, and that

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;