사문서위조등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On May 18, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging private documents at the Jung-gu District Court on May 18, 2017, and the judgment was finalized on August 23, 2017. On January 12, 2018, the Incheon District Court sentenced the Defendant to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging private documents, etc., and the judgment was finalized on March 15, 2018.
【Criminal Facts】
The Defendant opened and disposed of a mobile phone machine to a person who operates C agency in the Guri-si B, and opened the mobile phone machine to the customer, using the name of the customer holding the personal information, referring to as “D”, and opened the mobile phone machine by forging a written application for subscription in the name of the customer, and used it as agency operating expenses.
1. Around November 9, 2015, the Defendant forged a private document forgery with four copies of the application form for the opening of the mobile phone in the name of each customer, who is a private document relating to rights and obligations, from November 9, 2015 to May 13, 2016, stating “E” as if he/she applied for the opening of the mobile phone at the same place, and signing the application form in the column of the buyer (consignor) and the applicant/subscriber (agent) column. In addition, the Defendant forged four copies of the application form for the opening of the mobile phone in the name of each customer, who is a private document relating to the rights and obligations, for the purpose of uttering over four occasions, as shown in the attached list of crimes (1).
2. On November 9, 2015, the Defendant submitted to the staff-in-charge C, who is aware of the forgery at the above location, as seen above, an application for subscription to a forged mobile phone as if it were a document duly formed. On four occasions from November 9, 2015 to May 13, 2016, the Defendant submitted an application for subscription to each customer’s mobile phone in the name of each customer to the staff-in-charge in charge of communications, respectively.
3. The criminal defendant is guilty.