2. The costs of the lawsuit shall include costs resulting from the participation.

1. Name, location and area of industrial complex;

(a) Name: C general industrial complex;

(b) Location: Members of Pyeongtaek-si in Gyeonggi-do;

(c) Area: 4,824,912 square meters;

2. The purpose of designating a complex;

(a) Improving the competitiveness of an industrial complex by building up a high-tech industrial cluster linked to the neighboring industrial complex;

(b) Creation of an industrial complex based on knowledge through attracting universities and research facilities;

(c) Construction of a global education city through the attraction of foreign companies and foreign students in universities;

3. The operator of the industrial complex development project;

(a) Implementers: E;

(b) Address: Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G;

4. Period and method of development of the industrial complex;

A. Period of development: From August 2009 to December 31, 2013

Methods of development: Private-Public Joint Development

5. Plans for the placement of the types of major industries and industries;

(a) Business types to be invited: Business manufacturing electronic components, computer image, sound and communications equipment, medical precision, optical semesters, visual manufacturing, and other machinery and equipment manufacturing business, business manufacturing automobiles and liftss, other transport equipment manufacturing business, and research and development business;

(b) The omission of placement plans to be invited;

6. The land use plan or major infrastructure plan omitted.

A. On March 15, 2010, the Defendant approved and publicly notified the “C General Industrial Complex Plan” (hereinafter “instant plan”) under Article 15 of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Simplification of Authorization Procedures for Industrial Complex (amended by Act No. 11019, Aug. 4, 2011) as follows, which was applied for by the E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) in order to implement a business creating “C General Industrial Complex” (hereinafter “instant industrial complex”) at Pyeongtaek-si Filwon.

(hereinafter “instant approval disposition”). Meanwhile, the Plaintiffs are landowners of the land located in the instant business area.

B. The Defendant did not implement the instant project on April 11, 2014 by Gyeonggi-do Public Notice H and I, and I, and the Defendant is not able to secure funds for the establishment of the project district and the promotion of the project.