However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 22:40 on November 26, 2012, the Defendant presented the same attitude that the victim would not have any intent or ability to pay the price, even though he did not have any intent or ability to pay the price, and did not pay the price to the victim, that is, he was provided by the victim with beer and beer equivalent to 110,000 won in total at the market price.

2. The Defendant, at around 03:20 on November 27, 2012, presented the same attitude that the victim would not have any intent or ability to pay the price, even though he did not have any intent or ability to pay the price, and did not pay the price to the victim, that is, he was provided by the victim with beer and beer equivalent to the total market value of 120,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to C and F

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution (it may have the record of punishment for the crime of the same kind, however, considering the fact that the amount of damage has been repaid to the victim F);