사기등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the substance of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (one year of imprisonment) is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. Each of the crimes of this case in full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant stolen property by taking advantage of the gaps in which the victims find or grow; and (b) the use of stolen credit cards without permission; (c) the number of crimes or the amount of damage is heavy; (d) the Defendant divided and reflects the Defendant’s mistake; (c) the Defendant did not have any history of punishment heavier than the fine; and (d) the Defendant did not have any history of punishment heavier than the fine; and (e) all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence imposed by the lower
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.