At around 11:10 on October 19, 2019, the Defendant found the victim C (Nam, 90 years of age) who was under the influence of alcohol in Gyeonggi-gu B, and demanded the victim to talk with his/her his/her fatherD while wanting to talk with him/her. However, the Defendant refused to leave for about 20 minutes without good cause.

(1) The defendant asserts that the defendant merely sought to look at the victim D and did not have a failure at the same place. However, considering the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., the defendant found the victim C's house under the influence of alcohol, i.e., the defendant sought to find the victim C's house under the influence of alcohol, i.e., the police officer called upon receiving the 112 report, fright to sound and fright in the presence of the police officer, ii he was arrested in the act of flagrantion, ii) the victim D was in the body of the victim C, whose father was his father at the time of the instant case, there was no need to look at the above victim, and iii) the victim C was under the influence of alcohol and stated in the investigative agency that the defendant did not comply with the request for withdrawal and withdrawal, the summary of evidence can not be accepted by the defendant. Therefore, the defendant's assertion that he did not accept the defendant's assertion).

1. To report internal investigation in a written statement C containing part of the defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 319 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;