When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant operated C Co., Ltd. in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul, and the victim D worked as an employee from October 201 to November 201, 2013.

around October 2011, the Defendant, at the location of the foregoing company, deducted KRW 58,500 from the victim’s benefits, etc., deducted KRW 2,110,080 from Oct. 1, 201 to Nov. 1, 2013, and stored in business by deducting KRW 2,53,680 on 26 occasions as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto, but paid KRW 253,68 million to the National Pension Service, and used it individually without paying KRW 1,856,40.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzleds the property of the victim who has been kept in business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the statement protocol (D) and the benefit ledger attached thereto, the national pension premium payment ledger, and the statutes governing the national pension premium payment ledger;

1. Relevant Article 356 of the Criminal Act and Articles 355(1) and 355 of the Criminal Act (including), and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the method and background of embezzlement of reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the Defendant asserts to the effect that he/she inevitably committed a crime due to the aggravation of management due to the occurrence of an outbreak of remedy, etc.), criminal conciliation has been established at an investigative agency. The victim received KRW 600,000 out of the amount of damages but did not receive the remainder, and the Defendant did not have any criminal record except for the amount of 300,000 won in 1996 and the amount of 200,000 won in violation of the Road Traffic Act in 199.