노동조합및노동관계조정법위반등
The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment is publicly announced.
1. The Defendants in the facts charged are the members of the company engaged in the collection and transportation of recyclable garbage in K, and the work in the (mul) line, and Defendant A is the director of the branch of the Korean Union of Chemical Textiles Industry Trade Union L. Defendant B is the head of the same branch office, Defendant C is the head of the same branch office, Defendant C’s head of the safety division of the same branch office, Defendant C’s head of the same branch office, Defendant D’s head of the same branch office, Defendant D’s head of the public relations division of the same branch office, Defendant F’s member of the same branch office, Defendant G’s members of the same branch office, and Defendant H is the persons of the same branch planning division.
In February 2014, the Democratic Labor Union L Branch of the National Union of Chemical Textiles Industry and Trade Union concluded a collective bargaining agreement with L with a right to collective bargaining (L) but (L) another labor union belonging to the Korean Union has been established within L, and (L) from mid- April 2015, it was required (L) to simplify collective bargaining by L companies.
However, the Defendants anticipated that the number of members of the labor union (the democratic labor union) to which they belong is less than the number of members of other labor unions, and that they cannot be selected as a representative labor union, they applied for annual leave of absence on May 2015 and applied for pressure to the company.
1. Where a representative trade union has decided on a trade union, no act of dispute shall be conducted unless it is decided with the consent of a majority of all the union members (limited to the union members belonging to the relevant business or place of business) who have participated in the procedure by direct, secret, or secret ballot;
Nevertheless, between May 3, 2015 and May 13, 2015, Defendants conspired to collectively refuse to provide labor by holding or attending an assembly on the grounds of the improvement of working conditions, such as correction of discrimination against union members belonging to the Democratic Union of the National Union of Chemical Textiles and Textiles Industry Workers, supervision of business for union members, etc., without obtaining permission from the National LL prior to Now in M for about six (6) days.
2. The Defendants are the defendants.