beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.11.23 2016고단4719

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등

Text

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the charge of violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “accident”) is acquitted. Of the facts charged in the instant case.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA car. A. The Defendant is a person who is in driving a DNA car.

On May 21, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc.") (hereinafter referred to as the "Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes") driving the above car around 18:00, and driving it on the 71-lane road in front of the camping bus public parking lot at Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, at the 200km away from the ethical basin to the 201-km area.

At all times, the F&F car of the victim E (n.e., 47 years old) was temporarily stopped due to the body of the vehicle. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by accurately manipulating the steering system and the steering system and operating the steering system in a safe manner.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and did not accurately operate the steering gear and operating operation system without accurately operating the steering gear and operation system, and took the back part of the flive passenger vehicle into the front part of the flive passenger vehicle, and due to the shock of the flive passenger vehicle in the front part of the flive passenger vehicle, the Defendant got the back part of the flive passenger vehicle of the flive passenger G(K) for the flive passenger vehicle in the front section while pushing the flive passenger vehicle in the future.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim E, such as salt, tensions, etc. of the tensions that require approximately two weeks of medical treatment, suffered injury on the victim I (the 17th age), such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, and suffered injury on the victim G, such as chills, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks of medical treatment. The Defendant damaged the said flapsing car to cover KRW 2,693,179, and did not immediately stop the said flabing taxi with the repair cost to cover KRW 1,096,08, and did not take necessary measures.