2. In light of the fact that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and violated the depth of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant was punished several times for the same crime. In particular, the Defendant cannot be deemed to have committed each of the instant crimes even if he/she was sentenced to four months of imprisonment by larceny at the Gwangju District Court on June 24, 2010 and had been punished for a repeated crime on September 22, 2010, even if he/she had completed the enforcement of the sentence and had been punished for a repeated crime, in view of all the sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the following: (a) the number of the instant crimes was planned and sealed; (b) the number of crimes was planned and sealed; (c) the victims did not reach an agreement; and (d) did not

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.