However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around September 21, 2010, the Defendant threatened the victim with a deadly weapon (29cm in length, 17cm in length) in the kitchen, which was in the kitchen, when the Defendant’s mother and the horse dispute occurred in the residence of the Defendant, 204, Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and 204, and when the Defendant took part in his family issues, the victim D (the South, 36 years old) who was in the front of the invasion, was in the kitchen, and was in the kitchen, and thereby threatened the victim by means of taking part in his family affairs and driving away the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of seizure records and list statutes;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., the reflection of the fact and the victim's punishment is not imposed);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;