건축허가신청반려처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The Plaintiff’s ground of appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the assertion in the court of first instance.
Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is added or added as follows, and if the construction of the multi-family house exceeds one household in the instant application site is permitted as evidence submitted by the plaintiff in this court, the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the ground of the judgment, except for the rejection of the statement of evidence No. 16, which is insufficient to reverse the purpose of the district unit plan, and thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420
The 6th of the judgment of the first instance court "the defendant" shall be raised to "the plaintiff".
The term "other meaning" in the 7th sentence of the first instance judgment shall be interpreted as "other meaning on the port."
Then, “The provisions of Article 3-2(8) of the Building Act (referred to as “the extension, dissolution, repair or alteration of the boundary walls between households in multi-family houses or multi-household houses”)” shall be added to “the provisions of Article 3-2(8) of the Building Act (referred to as “the provisions”) or “the provisions of Article
The 7th of the judgment of the first instance shall be clearly divided into "the first instance court's 13 lines" and "the first instance court's 13 lines."
The term "contributability" of 8.3 lines in the judgment of the first instance shall be applied to "contributity".
8-9 lines in the judgment of the first instance shall be 6-9 lines as follows.
(2) (2) However, the opinion of the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport on the interpretation of the above provision is not bound by the court regarding the interpretation of the enforcement guidelines, and even according to the contents of Article 16(7)1 and 2 of the Guidelines on the Management of Housing Site Development Business, it does not seem to be prohibited from limiting the number of households per house to be constructed on an individual parcel into one household under the implementation guidelines. 8th decision of the first instance court (hereinafter “satisfly distinguishing”) is made by cutting the “satisfly distinguishing” of the 14th decision.
The judgment of the court of first instance shall consist of 8 21 to 9 1:00 as follows.
【(as alleged by the Plaintiff, G located in the original State, G.