2. 50,000 won where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

On July 9, 2012, from around 02:10 to around 02:35 of the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force for about 25 minutes, such as: (a) the Defendant’s purchase of tobacco to the victim D (here, 46 years of age) within the convenience store located in Kimhae-si B, but the Defendant respondeded to the victim that he was aware of the fact; (b) the Defendant was using a large interest for the reason that the victim was suffering from the purchase of tobacco; and (c) the Defendant’s demand for the victim to leave the disturbance, such as “I am aware of it, I am. I am, I am. I am. I am., the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reason under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act above.