beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.10.07 2016노1674

범인도피

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below (two years of suspended sentence in six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment on the grounds of appeal, and make a false confession by the defendant on behalf of the investigative agency C, etc. that he committed the crime under influence of alcohol on behalf of the criminal investigation agency, etc., the crime of this case is not less than the nature of the crime in light of the content and method of the crime, and the crime of attempted crimes that interfere with the proper criminal justice of the State requires strict punishment, etc., which are disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, if the defendant recognizes the crime of this case and reflects the defendant's mistake in depth, it seems that there is no profit acquired as consideration for the crime of this case according to C's request, which leads to no profit acquired as consideration for the crime of this case. The prosecutor's investigation conducted the crime of this case, which led to the confession of the crime of this case and the interference with the criminal justice action of this case, which does not actually occur, and the economic situation of the basic living recipients is not sufficiently sufficient, the registration of establishment of licensed real estate agent office is revoked in the case of this case, the registration of establishment of licensed real estate agent office is revoked, and there is no other special criminal punishment except three times of fines due to the violation of the Business Affairs of Licensed Real Estate Agents and Report of Real Estate Transactions Act, balance with the general sentencing in the case of the same or similar kind, and the defendant's age, character, character, intelligence and environment, the motive, means and result of the crime of this case, the circumstances, criminal records, family relations, economic circumstances, etc., the judgment of the court below is justified, and it is justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is reasonable, and therefore, Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act is applicable.