When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant possesses a dog, and the victim B (the age of 28) is a neighbor who lives in the opposite part of the defendant.

The defendant has a duty of care to prevent harm to others by managing the dog he raised so as not to threaten others or cause harm to others.

Nevertheless, at around 14:30 on June 15, 2014 due to negligence, the Defendant neglected this, and caused the victim to suffer approximately three weeks of elbows, by leaving the dog managed by the Defendant on the street in front of the C Housing in a unfolded state, leaving the Defendant’s residence, and allowing the victim to marbow part of the victim’s arms and elbows.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;