beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.06.03 2014고단315

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for 3 years from the date of the conclusion of the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 18, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (injury by collective action, deadly weapons, etc.) provided a bath to the victim E (the age of 46) who drinks in the D restaurant in C at the D restaurant located in C at the d restaurant at the d restaurant at the d restaurant at the d shop at the d restaurant at the d shop at the d shop at the d shop at the d shop, thereby making the victim take a bath, thereby making the victim walk

The defendant, "drawing the victim", refers to "drawing the victim's face", was taken by drinking the victim's chests, and lost the mind after pushing the victim's chests over the floor, and caused the victim's spath and spathing the victim's spath, which was used on the floor, and then pushed the victim's spath with the victim's spath and hand.

그리고 피고인은 그곳에 있던 위험한 물건인 철제의자를 들어 피해자의 머리를 내리치고, 발로 피해자의 옆구리, 얼굴 등을 수회 찼다.

As a result, the Defendant got two typists in need of treatment for about 14 days.

2. At around 22:10 on April 18, 2014, the Defendant was at the place indicated in paragraph (1), and around 22:10, the Defendant: (a) there was no fact that Hain G and Hain on the process of reporting to the above restaurant proprietor, etc., who was asked him about the 112 report; (b) the Hain G and Ha in the F District of the Dong Police Station, who was called out after having received 112 report for the said reason; and (c) there was no fact that Ha in the above G’s chest by hand, Hain Hakh, the president, knif, knife, and knife, knife the police officer, who was in the police station, died of Hakn in the house; and (d) the police officer, who was in the police station, was threatened by Haknk's kn's knife and Hak again brought about Hak's.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in regard to 112 reports.

(i) the evidence;