beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.11.27 2018고단3402

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. No person who violates the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry by money exchange shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging money exchange or re-purchase of intangible results obtained through the use of game water;

However, from March 1, 2018 to April 9, 2018, the Defendant established 40 games in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu B and 3’s “C Game site” in Seoul, Mapo-gu, and: (a) inserted an IC card into the inside card box; (b) inserted the IC card into the face-to-face box to many unspecified customers; and (c) made the game by inserting the IC card into the face-to-face box to the unspecified number of customers; and (d) collected the IC card with the points obtained by the customers upon the completion of the game; and (e) made the IC card to collect the IC card with the points obtained by the customers and exchange the remaining 10% out of the points to the customers in cash; and (e) divided the 10% amount into 5% amount with the name-to-face and 5% amount with the name-to-face.

As a result, the defendant in collusion with his/her name in order to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water for business purposes.

2. No one who violates the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry by remodeling or altering a game machine shall provide such game products for the distribution or use, or display or store such products for a purpose, different from the contents of the rating classification;

In this regard, the Defendant classified the game water management committee into “the beginning of a game by inserting the earth and inserting an IC card” at the time and place indicated in paragraph 1, but unlike the rating classification, the Defendant installed 40 types of the IC game, which read “the form installed inside the inside and outside to prevent users from inserting or removing the IC card by preventing the front side of the game from inserting the IC card,” which read “the form installed in the inside and outside to prevent the IC card from inserting or removing the IC card itself from being connected with the outside.”

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the game products classified.