In order to obtain insurance money by taking advantage of the fact that insurance money is paid according to the period of hospitalization when a disaster is hospitalized and that additional insurance money is paid when a loss occurs after the occurrence of a disaster, the Defendant purchased a total of 11 insurance policies, such as the victim’s fire insurance company’s “Cheongchip Policy 100 years old,” from January 18, 2012 to September 14, 2012 as the insured.

1. On May 19, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime of defraudation of hospitalization expenses: (a) was committed in the Defendant’s residential surroundings near the Defendant’s residence located in Daegu-gu Seo-gu C; and (b) was aware of this fact from B, “A person who was hospitalized in a source of DNA surgery known to him/her in a false manner may claim hospitalization.”

It listens to the language to the purport that ", after being hospitalized in the above hospital by falsity, he was able to obtain insurance money by fraud for the purpose of hospitalization expenses.

On May 21, 2012, the Defendant came to know through B of the Daegu Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daneology, “A doctor F shall be treated as hospitalized treatment, as the Defendant was treated differently from the right side of the road while riding a bicycle on May 19, 2012.

“Falsely speaking, from June 18, 2012 to June 18, 2012, the hospital was hospitalized and issued with a diagnosis certificate, a certificate of entrance and discharge, and a record book, etc., and was conducted as if the hospital was hospitalized for 29 days. On June 21, 2012, the victim Samsung T&T Co., Ltd. submitted the above documents to the victim Samsung T&T Disaster Insurance Co., Ltd. and claimed KRW 1,581,462 as the cost of hospitalization.

However, in fact, the Defendant was a bicycle going out from the Defendant’s residential area near the Defendant’s residence, and there was no fact that the Defendant was far away from the two ridges, and the Defendant’s injury was an injury to the extent of need for outpatients treatment. As such, the Defendant did not have a necessary injury for which hospitalized treatment was conducted for 29 days due to the said accident.

The defendant in collusion with B, as above.