2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

On August 19, 2016, around 00:13, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report from C and C, a taxi engineer, due to the payment of taxi expenses in front of the Busan Southern Police Station, the Busan Southern Police Station, the Busan Southern Police Station, which was in front of the Busan Southern Police Station, and requested C to return home by paying the taxi expenses from E in the circumstances where the Busan Southern Police Station D Zone D, the Busan Southern Police Station, which was called for, and requested E to do so. (b) The Defendant committed assault against E, such as “Ye, chrop, spahn, knick, knick, knick, knick, knick, knick, etc., on one occasion of his chest part.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on statement to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no previous sentence and the fact that a mistake is divided, etc.);