When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

『2016 고 정 3018』 피고인은 2016. 5. 3. 05:01 경 수원시 팔달구 B, 2 층에 있는 피해자 C가 운영하는 'D 주점' 내에서 피해 자로부터 술과 음식을 제공받더라도 그 대금을 정상적으로 지급할 의사나 능력이 없음에도, 마치 대금을 제대로 지급할 것처럼 주문하여, 이에 속은 종업원 E으로부터 시가 228,000원 상당의 앱 솔 루트 보드카 1 병, 버드 아이스 맥주 2 병, 박 카 디 샷 2 잔, 쥬스 1 잔 등을 제공받아 편취하였다.

On April 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 02:33, the “H main point” operated by the Victim G in Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and (b) took place as if he would pay the drinking value despite the absence of any specific means of payment, such as cash or card, and (c) took place as if he would pay the said value, and (d) he received the orders from the employee I to the VOSP 1 C, HOSP 1 C, HV 1 C, HV 1 C, HV 1 C, HV 1 C, 1800 C, 4 C, and 775,000 C, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 High 3018"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Invoice;

1. On-site photographs of 2016 Gohap 3019;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of J;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;