If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. On August 6, 2012, at around 13:00 on August 6, 2012, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would work as an employee from August 7, 2012 to one month from August 7, 2012, as a pre-paid payment, to be a 2.45 million won.”

However, even if Defendant’s prepaid payment was received, there was no intention or ability to work as a multiple employee.

The defendant deceivings the victim and received 2.45 million won from the victim.

2. On August 6, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant will work together with the victim, who was living together in Jeju-do, in Jeju-do, with the amount of KRW 4 million.”

However, even if the defendant receives the advance payment, he did not have the intention or ability to live together and to make a living.

The defendant deceivings the victim and received 4 million won from the victim around August 7, 2012.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;